The Word Has Appeared in the Flesh

Every stage of the work God does has its practical significance. At that time when Jesus came, he was a male. When God comes this time, he is a female. From this you can see that God’s creating both male and female can be for his work and that with God there is no gender difference. When his Spirit comes, he can put on either flesh and this flesh can represent him. Whether this flesh is a male or a female, he can represent God as long as he is the incarnated flesh of God. If Jesus had come as a female, that is, if a female baby but not a male baby had been conceived by the Holy Spirit at that time, she could have accomplished that stage of the work just the same. If that were the case, the work of today would have to be done by a male, and he could also accomplish the work. Both stages of the work are meaningful. They do not repeat and yet do not contradict each other. When Jesus did the work at that time, he was called the only begotten Son. Since he was called “Son,” he was a male. Why is God not called the only begotten Son in this stage? Because he has been incarnated in a different gender from Jesus’ according to the need of the work. With God there is no gender difference. He does whatever he wants to do. He does his work free from any restrictions and in a very free manner, yet either stage of his work has its practical significance. As God has been incarnated twice, needless to say, the end time is the last time. He has come to manifest all of his deeds. If in this stage God did not do the work personally through being incarnated and let people see him with their own eyes, they would always have the notion that God is only a male and not a female. Before this, people all believed that God could only be a male and that a female could not be called God, because they regarded man as having authority over woman and believed that woman could not hold authority and only man could. And they said that man was the head of woman and that woman had to submit to man and could not be above man. “Man was the head of woman,” which was said before, was directed at the Adam and Eve who had been beguiled by the serpent, not directed at the man and woman created by Jehovah in the beginning. Of course, women must submit to their husbands and love their husbands, and husbands must learn to support their families. This is a decree and law set down by Jehovah, which mankind must abide by when they live on earth. Jehovah said to the woman, “Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you.” He said that just for the purpose that mankind (that is, men and women) could live a normal life under his authority and live an orderly but not abnormal life. So, Jehovah set down a proper regulation as to how man and woman should live. That was only directed at all created beings living on earth, which has nothing to do with the incarnated flesh of God. How could God be the same as created beings? What he said was only directed at created mankind, and it was for the purpose that created mankind could live a normal life that he set down that regulation for both man and woman. When Jehovah created mankind in the beginning, he created two kinds of people, male and female. So when he was incarnated, he was incarnated as a male one time and as a female one time. He does not plan his work according to the word he said to Adam and Eve. He determines his two incarnations completely according to the thought he had when he created mankind in the beginning. That is, he accomplishes his two works of incarnation by the male and female who have not been corrupted. If people measure God’s work of incarnation according to what Jehovah said to the “Adam and Eve who had been beguiled by the serpent” at that time, then shouldn’t Jesus also have had to “desire the wife he should desire”? In that case, could God still be God? If that had been the case, could he have accomplished his work? If it were a mistake for God to have been incarnated as a female, then wouldn’t it have been a great mistake for God to have created woman? If people still think that it is a mistake for God to have been incarnated as a female, then wouldn’t Jesus have also been a mistake as the incarnated flesh of today, since Jesus neither got married nor desired his wife? Since you measure God’s incarnation of today according to Jehovah’s word to Eve, you should measure the incarnated Lord Jesus of the Age of the Grace according to Jehovah’s word to Adam. Are the two cases not the same? Since you measure the Lord Jesus by the male who had not been beguiled by the serpent, you cannot measure the incarnation of today by the female who had been beguiled by the serpent. That’s unfair! If you measure that way, it shows that you have no sense. The genders of the two incarnated fleshes of Jehovah are related to the male and female who had not been beguiled by the serpent. He was incarnated twice in the gender of the male and female who had not been beguiled by the serpent. Do not think that Jesus’ male gender is the same as that of the Adam who had been beguiled by the serpent. “He” and “he” have no connection at all and are two males with different natures. Does the fact that Jesus is a male prove that he is only the head of all women but not the head of all men? Was he not the king of all the Jews (men and women)? He is God Godself and is not only the head of women but also the head of men. He is the Lord of all created beings and the head of all created beings. How could you say that Jesus’ male gender is a symbol that he is the head of women? Isn’t this a blasphemy? Jesus is a male who is not corrupted. He is God, Christ, and Lord. How could he be of the male gender of the Adam who had been corrupted? Jesus is the flesh in which the most holy Spirit of God was clothed. How could you say that he is a God who has the male gender of Adam? If that had been the case, wouldn’t God’s work have been totally a mistake? Could Jehovah have put into Jesus the male gender of the Adam who had been beguiled? Isn’t the incarnation of today another work done by the incarnated flesh who is different from Jesus in gender but the same as Jesus in nature? Do you still dare to say that God cannot be incarnated as a female because woman was first beguiled by the serpent? Do you still dare to say that God cannot possibly be incarnated as a female because woman is the filthiest and is the origin of mankind’s corruption? Do you still dare to say, “Woman should forever submit to man and woman can never be God’s manifestation or directly represent God”? Before, you did not understand. Now, will you still blaspheme God’s work, especially the incarnated flesh of God? If you cannot discern it, you had better not say anything about it rashly lest you show your foolishness and ignorance and display your ugliness. Do not think that you know everything. I tell you, with what you have seen and experienced so far, you cannot even understand one thousandth of my management plan. What are you arrogant about? Your little bit of talent and knowledge are not even enough for Jesus to do his work with for a second! How many experiences do you have? What you have seen, what you have heard all your life, and what you imagine are even less than the work I do in a moment! You had better not find fault. You, however arrogant, are still a created being less than an ant! All that is in your belly is even less than that in an ant’s belly! Do not think you can air your views as you like because you have gained many experiences and much seniority. Isn’t it through the words I speak that you have gained many experiences and much seniority? Do you think you have gained them through your own hard work? It is because you have seen my incarnation of today that you have so many rich imaginations and thus have countless notions. Without my incarnation, you could not have so many imaginations even if you have remarkable talents. Didn’t you form your notions out of it? If Jesus had not been incarnated the first time, you would know nothing about incarnation! Isn’t it because the first incarnation was made known to you that you dare to judge this second incarnation presumptuously? You do not seek to be an obedient follower. What are you studying for? Since you have entered this stream and come before the incarnated God, will she allow you to study her? You may study your family history, but if you want to study God’s “family history,” will the God of today let you study it like that? Aren’t you blind? Aren’t you inviting rejection?

If God had only done Jesus’ work of that stage but did not do this stage in the end time, then people would always have the notion that only Jesus is God’s only begotten Son, that is, God has only one Son and if another one comes with a different name, he cannot be God’s only begotten Son, much less God Godself. People have the notion that he who is a sin offering is God’s only begotten Son, and that he who assumes power on behalf of God and redeems the whole mankind is God’s only begotten Son. Some people believe that he who comes as a male can be called God’s only begotten Son, that is, can represent God. Some even say that Jesus is Jehovah’s Son, his only begotten Son. Isn’t this a very fallacious notion that people have? If in the final age God had not come to do this stage of the work, God would be shrouded by all mankind in their notions. In that case, men would consider themselves superior to women and women could never lift up their head. Then none of the females would be saved. People always believe that God is a male and that God always loathes women and he will not save women. If that were the case, wouldn’t all women who were created by Jehovah and who have also been corrupted never have the opportunity to be saved? Then wouldn’t it have been meaningless for Jehovah to have created woman, Eve? Wouldn’t women perish eternally? So, the work of this stage in the end time is to save all mankind, not only to save women but to save all mankind. It is a work done for all mankind and not just for women. If anyone thinks that way, he is even more foolish!